












Return to Table of Contents
I flipped cards passably, too, and delighted in winning a Jackie Robinson while risking only a Wally Westlake. Cards were currency in more ways than one.

John Thorn is the
author and editor of many
books, mostly about
sports, as well as
occasional pieces for the
New York Times, Los
Angeles Times, and
Boston Globe. He lives
in Saugerties, New York.
Copyright © John Thorn.
|
New York Folklore Society
P.O. Box 764
Schenectady, NY 12301
518/346-7008 Fax 518/346-6617
nyfs@nyfolklore.org
|
|
|
|
PUBLICATIONS | VOICES | BACK ISSUES | FOLKLORE IN ARCHIVES | FOLK ARTISTS SELF-MGT | ORDER PUBLICATIONS | SEARCH
 |
I was a newcomer to this country in 1949, a
German-speaking boy trying to fit in as an
American. My parents had conceived me in a
displaced persons camp in Stuttgart as
affirmation of their survival and as revenge
against Hitler. Somehow they conveyed to me
very early on that the world was not a safe
place and that caution and seclusion were
essential life skills. Thus reticent by nature and
circumstance, all the same I longed for risk
and inclusion.
Baseball cards were my way in, and my way
out. These cardboard gods were my tickets of
admission to the street games of the Bronx
and passports to a larger sense of being
somehow American. I learned to read from
the backs of the cards, those magically
encapsulated hagiographies, and discovered I
had an unusual memory for facts and figures
that, in the older gang into which I sought
admission, lent me the jester’s motley of
amusement and license. I flipped cards
passably, too, and delighted in winning a Jackie
Robinson while risking only a Wally Westlake.
Cards were currency in more ways than one.
My parents, of course, viewed my streetcorner
competitions as unserious and
unworthy—if I were such a prodigy that I
could read baseball cards, why not the Talmud?
Chubby and unathletic, I was permanently “it”
in games of tag and a figure of fun at
hopscotch or ringolevio. Until my teen years
when, sprouted and slimmed, I was
miraculously able to play the game I had
known only through its fetishes, my bubblegum
cards provided safe passage through
rings and ring leaders. Like all games, as I was
later to learn, they provided early instruction
in the rules of adult society: mimicking its
rules of inclusion and exclusion, sublimating
its rites of war, and creating a bazaar of barter
and status.
Fast forward half a century. The games that
had connected a lonely boy to his peers and
provided a peephole into the adult world now
connect a grandfather to his youth—with
reminiscent pleasure, certainly, but always
questions, questions. Now a historian of
sport, an analyst of play, I collect stories rather
than cards as my trophies. And I recently came
across a good one in an 1891 issue of the
American Journal of Folklore, by Stewart Culin,
one of the giants of folklore studies but
heretofore unknown to me.
As with the long-standing question of
when baseball began, to which I have been
supplying tentative answers for some time, I
had wondered when baseball-card flipping and
trading commenced. For me it was 1952, but
I knew that in the 1880s photographic and
chromolith cards were inserted into cigarette
packs, whose primary purchasers were
presumably not children. Culin, in “Street
Games of Boys in Brooklyn, New York,” cites
thirty-six games described to him by “a lad of
ten years, residing in the city of Brooklyn, N.Y.,
as games in which he himself had taken part.”
From hare and hounds to red rover, from
leap frog to kick the can, Culin details games
that many of us recall from our own youths,
however many years since. The thirty-sixth
game I relate verbatim:
PICTURES: This game is a recent
invention, and is played with the small
picture cards which the manufacturers of
cigarettes have distributed with their wares
for some years past. These pictures, which
are nearly uniform in size and embrace a
great variety of subjects, are eagerly collected
by boys in Brooklyn and the nearby cities,
and form an article of traffic among them.
Bounds are marked of about twelve by
eight feet, with a wall or stoop at the back.
The players stand at the longer distance,
and each in turn shoots a card with his
fingers, as he would a marble, against the
wall or stoop. The one whose card goes
nearest that object collects all the cards that
have been thrown, and twirls them either
singly or together into the air. Those that
fall with the picture up belong to him,
according to the rules; while those that fall
with the reverse side uppermost are
handed to the player whose card came next
nearest to the wall, and he in turn twirls
them, and receives those that fall with the
picture side up. The remainder, if any, are
taken by the next nearest player, and the
game continues until the cards thrown are
divided.
Boys badgered men coming out of
tobacconist shops for the pictures in their
cigarette packs, or they took up smoking early.
That the cards were worthless to most adults
may have added to their value for children . . .
such is the spin of generations. Once it became
clear who the customers for the cards truly
were, the candy and gum manufacturers got
into the act, including cards with their
products; by 1920 or so baseball cards ceased
to be packed with cigarettes. The cards entered
a golden age that coincided with my own
boyhood in the 1950s, as the Topps Gum
Company issued cards of surpassing charm
that today are auctioned at Sotheby’s rather
than skipped over pavement to lean against
apartment house walls. Card-flipping was
clearly a game of the city, where sidewalks
outnumbered grassy fields or even sandlots.
Culin notes that like other street games, it had
been “modified to suit the circumstances of
city life.” Card flipping in my boyhood was
not baseball, surely, and yet as its surrogate it
retained something of the larger game’s spell.
There was joy and reverence in the handling
of our totems, some of which we withheld
from corner-clipping confrontations unless the
reward equaled the risk.
We were oasis traders more than we were
ball players, but we felt we were a part of the
game. Duke Snider and the Dodgers were sure
to prevail at Ebbets Field if an artful wrist
snap could lean him against the stoop,
vanquishing all the cards beneath him. And
in the power of transference that accompanies
such magical acts, we were heroes, too.
|
John Thorns Play column was published in Voices Vol. 32, "Fall Winter 2006. Voices is the membership magazine of the New York Folklore Society. To become a subscriber, join the New York Folklore Society now.
HOME | ABOUT NYFS | PROGRAMS & SERVICES | PUBLICATIONS | RESOURCES | CALENDAR | WHATS FOLKLORE? | MEMBERSHIP | GALLERY | SHOP |
SEARCH | CONTACT US
© 2008, 2007 New York Folklore Society
|